One of the other causes I’ve become interested in, even though I can’t give blood (I’ll tell you the story sometime, it’s funny, and my arm turned purple and everything!). Here’s a good video summing up the situation (and even I learned that bisexual men can’t give blood, I never realized that):
After years of work, leadership and a massive service project, one final Scoutmaster conference (usually a very unique one at that), a Scout sits on a Board of Review from the local district. And they decide whether to approve the application (usually those turned down have something else to complete to satisfaction, it’s not a closed door forever).
Yes, National processes the applications and keeps copies of everything, but I’ve never heard of National rejecting the work of a local Board of Review.
National hides behind technicalities about the date, and has forced the local employees in a position where they must fight the local volunteers, which is a shitty place for anyone to be in, and very cowardly if you ask me. GLAAD and Scouts for Equality have slammed the organization, but sadly, I don’t foresee National changing their mind.
A father in Brooklyn is starting a Scouting troop open to women and gays.
There are actually a bunch of these organizations that spring up, I’ll have to write about them sooner or later.
And, fun fact, the BSA will allow girls to join if there is not a Girl Scout Troop nearby. Also, Venturing is co-ed, and it starts at age 14, focused mainly on high adventure (but units can specialize in other interests if they wish), and there is also Exploring (for now) and Learning for Life, a school program.
I’m a bit mixed on the women issue. Venturing was pretty much created because GSA was doing a terrible job of retaining older girls and giving them what they actually wanted to do, so the BSA stepped in. That, by the way, is reality, not at all what anyone official will tell you.
But of course, I support opening the program to gay, bisexual and transgendered youth, they need to know they matter, they have value and they are not broken.
Will this new group change anything? Not on the national scene, but for those kids, it will mean the world.
DADT is no more. Although, as I’ve mentioned before, there is still work to be done. The repeal still does not offer transgendered individuals the right to serve in the armed forces. And now, we have taken another step forward and another step back.
The ACLU has won it’s case, allowing those discharged under DADT to receive full separation pay. It goes back to 2004, and I hope that the branches of the military will also make sure all those thrown out under DADT are changed to receive honorable discharges.
The case goes before the Supreme Court this spring with a ruling expected in June. President Obama has refused to defend the law, hence the GOP deciding to do it instead.
And sadly, no, this is not an Eddie Izzard sketch.
Britain is set to legalize marriage equality, but in a strange twist of fate, they will prohibit the Church of England from performing gay marriages. Which opens a strange discussion about the separation of church and state, but then again, it’s not the United States.
The Church of England will allow gay bishops, even partnered gay bishops, but only if they are celibate. So barring the fact that they can’t get married, at least in a church setting, they have a strange set of requirements, only brought upon themselves.
So, the odd thing, is now Muslims are mad that they are being treated differently. It’s strange, for only the CoE to be treated one way, but being the state religion, I guess they can do that.
Still, it’s all very confusing, at least to a damn Yankee across the pond.